AMD’s Radeon RX 6000 ‘Huge Navi’ performance tease reveals an RTX 3080 rival

Please log in or register to like posts.

RTX 3080 vs. Radeon RX 6000: FIGHT!


This day’s Handiest Tech Deals

Picked by PCWorld’s Editors

High Deals On Huge Products

Picked by Techconnect’s Editors

This day’s AMD match also can possess been Zen 3’s extensive gift, however the firm tossed a juicy bone to the Radeon devoted, too. After announcing the beastly Ryzen 9 5900X (among others), CEO Lisa Su then confirmed off gameplay photos of Borderlands 3 working on the CPU at 4K resolution with an undisclosed Radeon RX 6000-series graphics card. And positive, Web, AMD’s “Huge Navi” goes toe-to-toe even with Nvidia’s brutally like a flash GeForce RTX 3080.

The mysterious Radeon RX 6000 GPU averaged 61 frames per 2nd even with the game working on its punishing “Badass” performance preset. Su also printed that the Ryzen/Radeon combo hit 88 fps in Name of Accountability: Up to the moment War (an Nvidia-partnered title) and 73 fps in Gears 5 on Extremely visual presets. AMD plans to snarl the Radeon RX 6000-series “Huge Navi” graphics cards formally on October 28 in a dedicated match.

In a name earlier than the Zen 3 match, Radeon chief Scott Herkelman steered me that AMD determined to tease Huge Navi’s performance due to community inquire of of for more info. It absolutely modified into once an gape-opening gift.


That’s like a flash.

Hexus tested the $700 GeForce RTX 3080 in Gears 5 and Borderlands 3 using the equivalent visual presets as AMD did with this Radeon RX 6000 preview, on AMD’s Ryzen 9 3950X. The RTX 3080 hit 59.4fps in Borderlands 3, in comparison with the Radeon RX 6000’s 61fps in this preview. In Gears 5, the RTX 3080 hit 77fps, in comparison with the Radeon RX 6000’s 73fps. The processor makes a incompatibility, even supposing, because in Eurogamer’s GeForce RTX 3080 evaluation with a Core i9-10900K, Nvidia’s card hit 65fps in Borderlands, and 80fps in Gears 5

That apparently places AMD’s upcoming card neck-and-neck with Nvidia’s staggeringly powerful gaming flagship, relying on the processor it’s paired with. That’s damned spectacular—however it’s significant to realise what AMD didn’t gift at the present time, too.

Dissecting the AMD vs. Nvidia chess match

Most importantly, Herkelman harassed out that AMD didn’t notify which Radeon RX 6000 graphics card ran these benchmarks. We don’t know whether these results attain from the greatest Huge Navi GPU, or a more modest offering. (Herkelman also said there’s restful sharp-tuning left to attain earlier than open.) AMD’s Ryzen 9 5900X, the CPU frail for the tease, also hasn’t been tested by self sustaining reviewers.

Processors largely aren’t a performance limiter at lofty 4K resolutions, however as we confirmed earlier, they can have an effect on performance results. Which approach that pitting AMD’s benchmarks in opposition to Hexus and Eurogamer’s is no longer a easy apples-to-apples comparison. It’s also rate noting that every three video games that Su confirmed off in the Radeon RX 6000 teaser lunge on DirectX 12, rather than the more well-liked DX11 graphics API.

While this shall be a finest-case showing for AMD’s impending graphics cards, it would possibly well even be AMD’s sly strive to location the stage with a finest-case showing for Nvidia’s rival RTX 3080.


Nvidia’s contemporary “Ampere” GPU architecture inner the RTX 30-series delivers its finest performance in new APIs like DirectX 12 and Vulkan. Ampere also scales very smartly at extremely-excessive resolutions, where the insane option of shader cores inner these GPUs can flex their muscle mass without being constrained by one plan of aspects of the architecture. (Perchance that’s why Nvidia marketing and marketing contemplating 8K gaming performance with the GeForce RTX 3090.) The RTX 3080’s gains over final skills’s RTX 2080 Ti slim down greatly while you growth down to 1440p resolution, as our possess RTX 3080 evaluation benchmarks confirmed, and Hardware Unboxed aptly explained. Assorted aspects of Ampere become the bottleneck beneath 4K.

There’s hundreds of room for AMD to maneuver here. Radeon RX 6000 GPUs are constructed using RDNA 2, the 2nd skills of the RDNA graphics architecture that debuted in the (extraordinary) Radeon RX 5700-series. First-gen RDNA GPUs delivered swish efficiency gains that indirectly set apart Radeon graphics cards on a par with GeForce’s then-vaunted vitality efficiency, however AMD by no approach launched a user graphics card with a tidy RDNA 1 die, or true-time ray tracing capabilities.

RDNA 2—whose excessive-hand over iterations possess been informally dubbed “Huge Navi”—addresses every of those, on high of delivering every other 50 percent performance-per-watt expand, AMD says. AMD already confirmed that the contemporary graphics cards will also assist true-time ray tracing, appropriate like the subsequent-gen Xbox Sequence X and PlayStation 5 consoles also constructed with RDNA 2.


How Radeon RX 6000 graphics cards tackle true-time ray tracing will topic. Nvidia’s RTX GPUs render the strenuous cutting-edge lighting fixtures skills by offloading most of the work to dedicated hardware—RT cores that calculate bouncing light rays, and tensor cores that “denoise” the final image. That specialized hardware takes helpful die dwelling inner Ampere. Microsoft already confirmed that the AMD chip inner the Xbox Sequence X will also utilize some form of hardware acceleration for ray tracing, however the specifics will create a incompatibility in the PC model of RDNA 2.

If AMD’s ray tracing solution doesn’t earn as noteworthy on-die dwelling as Nvidia’s, that leaves the Radeon cards extra space to cram in used rendering hardware—shaders, ROPs, geometry pipelines, et cetera. And if AMD can indeed load up Huge Navi with more of that used hardware—especially now that CDNA’s arrival approach AMD can jettison compute-particular extras from RDNA to point of curiosity squarely on gaming—it would possibly well indeed potentially carry a extensive combat to Nvidia, and in all probability a ways more so at the more well-liked resolutions, where Ampere’s scaling isn’t moderately as potent.

Or even no longer. We gained’t know for obvious unless Radeon RX 6000 graphics cards are certainly in our palms. These preliminary 4K numbers from AMD learn about very promising, even supposing.

AMD Radeon

Enough game theory. You’ve been asking to learn about how smartly Huge Navi hangs with Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3080, and AMD delivered Radeon RX 6000 benchmarks at the present time. Huge Navi appears to be like to be like fine shocking, a ways more succesful than the relaxation Radeon has delivered in recent memory, and potentially appropriate as like a flash as Nvidia’s contemporary gaming champion. But now that we’ve viewed some numbers, we’re left with a ways more questions than earlier than. One thing is dash even supposing: Given Nvidia’s ongoing stock woes with the RTX 3080 and 3090, AMD appropriate gave frustrated enthusiasts an true motive to wait and learn about what Radeon RX 6000 graphics cards are able to.

Again, ponder in regards to the chubby Radeon RX 6000 gift on October 28, complete with a brand contemporary-learn about triple-fan cooling solution.

Imprint: While you like something after clicking links in our articles, we’re going to also set up a miniature commission. Be taught our affiliate link coverage for more particulars.

Senior editor Brad Chacos covers gaming and graphics for PCWorld, and runs the morning info desk for PCWorld, Macworld, Greenbot, and TechHive. He tweets too.

Be taught More


Already reacted for this post.

Nobody liked ?

output onlinepngtools 3