Three months aft the merchandise of the documentary Chris Brown: A History of Violence, the instrumentalist filed a suit successful the Superior Court of Los Angeles Jan. 21 against Ample LLC, Warner Bros. and producers progressive successful the film’s production, successful effect to their “defamatory documentary.”
“Despite being notified of the mendacious and misleading communicative accusing Mr. Brown of the heinous acts, including intersexual battle and grounds tampering,” work a Jan. 21 connection Brown posted to Instagram, “allegations that had been discredited successful tribunal and dismissed arsenic baseless—the defendants released the documentary connected October 27, 2024 without respect for Mr. Brown, prioritizing profits implicit journalistic integrity.”
E! News has reached retired to Warner Bros. and Ample but has not heard back.
In the film, an accuser referred to arsenic Jane Doealleged the R&B prima of drugging and raping her successful 2020. And aft she sued him for $20 cardinal dollars successful 2022, the claims were, according to the suit obtained by E!, “discredited, dismissed by the courts, oregon outright fabricated.”
Referring to an alleged incidental betwixt Doe and an unnamed boyfriend, the suit alleges that her “history of unit and erratic behaviour should person raised reddish flags for immoderate liable journalist” and that the documentary ignored an “established deficiency of veracity.”
The suit besides lays retired the toll Brown says the documentary has taken connected him.
“The defamatory contented successful the Documentary has caused important harm to Mr. Brown’s estimation vocation and concern ventures,” the suit states. “Beyond its idiosyncratic interaction connected Mr. Brown, the Documentary undermines liable storytelling and discredits existent survivors of Violence. As a effect of Defendants’ conduct, Mr. Brown has been near with nary prime but to record this suit to support not lone his estimation but besides the nationalist from improper journalistic tactics employed by the defendants.”
The suit further emphasizes the “With You” vocalist “has ne'er been recovered astatine responsibility for immoderate benignant of intersexual crime.”
(Photo by Tibrina Hobson/Getty Images)
However, implicit the years, the 35-year-old has faced a history of ineligible troubles, including his apprehension successful 2009 for assaulting then-girlfriend Rihanna during a confrontation earlier that year’s Grammys. Four months later, helium pleaded blameworthy to 1 number of battle with the intent of doing large bodily wounded and was sentenced to 5 years of probation.
He subsequently faced charges for assorted different alleged crimes, including a hit-and-run complaint successful 2013 and a felony battle complaint that aforesaid year. He was aboriginal cleared of the hit-and-run charge successful Superior Court, L.A. City Attorney spokesperson Frank Mateljan confirmed astatine the time, and his battle complaint was aboriginal reduced to a misdemeanor assault soon earlier he, arsenic his rep told E! successful 2013, entered rehab for choler management.
But contempt what helium whitethorn person done successful the past, Brown’s lawyer Levi McCathern said that the “Under the Influence” vocalist has been moving hard to turn and larn from his mistakes.
(Photo by Per-Anders Pettersson/Getty Images)
“This lawsuit is astir protecting the truth,” the lawyer said successful a abstracted statement. “Despite being provided with grounds disproving their claims, the producers of this documentary intentionally promoted mendacious and defamatory information, knowingly disregarding their ethical obligations arsenic journalists.”
“Their actions undermine not lone Mr. Brown’s decade-long efforts to rebuild his life,” helium continued, “but besides the credibility of existent survivors of violence.”
Read connected for much astir Brown’s past ineligible troubles…