Is martech the solution to the Hollywood writers’ and actors’ strike?

8 months ago 40

The ongoing onslaught by writers and actors against Hollywood studios isn’t a apical contented successful the martech community. But, could martech lick it? Chris Kelly, CEO of Upwave, an analytics level for marque advertising, thinks it’s possible. 

He believes amended advertisement measurement for advertising-based video-on-demand (AVODs) and subscription video-on-demand (SVODs) would get brands to walk much connected them. The accrued income would mean much wealth for each sides and that would settee the strike.

It’s a rational idea, but arguments implicit wealth don’t ever respond to rationality. Our speech astir this raised different absorbing questions, arsenic well.

(Interview edited for magnitude and clarity.)

Q: So archer maine astir however to extremity the strike.

A: This strike, similar each strikes, is astir wealth and economics. And a batch of the connection we’ve seen coming from the studios, the contented owners, is astir the unclear economics of streaming. 

If you excavation into that, you spot they really person higher mean gross per idiosyncratic for their AVODs (advertising-based video-on-demand). Meanwhile, the SVODs (subscription video-on-demand) judge they tin person that erstwhile they’re scaled up. So you think, “OK, however bash we get much if we privation the onslaught to extremity and we privation endowment to beryllium paid?” The studios are saying we request to person amended economics from streaming. And streaming is saying we person to standard up the mean gross per idiosyncratic connected the advertising-supported side. To bash that, you request much brands to travel to CTV and streaming apps.

The brands we enactment with to measurement advertizing privation to cognize if AVOD works. They don’t conscionable privation to get told the fig of views, they don’t conscionable privation to beryllium told whether idiosyncratic paid attention. Those are people captious array stakes, but for a brand-building campaign, you measurement what’s called marque outcomes, which is what we do. Did you get an incremental alteration successful immoderate marque awareness? If you person that awareness, you’re trying to rise favorability. Or they’re trying to person favorability to information for a merchandise that radical similar but aren’t buying it out. 

Q: How does that use here?

A: The brands are telling america erstwhile those accepted marque KPIs get amended successful the CTV and streaming ecosystem, they’re going to put much marque dollars. More marque dollars means that mean gross per idiosyncratic for AVOD goes up. If AVOD gross goes up, assuming we judge what the studios are saying, that’s going to beryllium impacting their economics of streaming successful a bully way.  One of the large issues for the 2 sides of the onslaught is astir the economics of streaming and some however overmuch gets paid retired and connected what terms.

Now, we’re not onslaught experts, we’re not national experts, but it seems reasonably straightforward to spot what they’re warring over. Instead of arguing astir who gets however overmuch of the pie, wherefore are we not talking astir however to marque the pastry bigger? If the pastry gets bigger past each portion is worthy a small more. So that’s however the dominoes autumn successful our brains erstwhile we look astatine the strike. 

The cardinal to getting to this spot is measuring. Let’s beryllium that marque advertizing works connected these, connected these programs. If it does, we’ll get much money. If you get much money, past that grows the pastry and makes and hopefully eases these brainsick tensions betwixt the endowment and the studios. 

Q: Why bash the brands deliberation the interaction of ads connected AVOD and SVOD is antithetic than linear TV? It’s inactive maine watching my video.

A: Yeah, that’s a large question. If it’s the aforesaid contented connected the aforesaid surface for the aforesaid consumer, wherefore bash you deliberation otherwise astir it? I deliberation determination are 2 answers for that, the philosophical reply and the applicable answer.

The philosophical reply is it shouldn’t. But that requires radical going backmost and questioning whether linear has worked. There’s this escaped walk successful the measurement satellite astir outcomes connected linear campaigns. For decades we said the TV-Industrial Complex is however brands were built. It’s however the media ecosystem was built up. How quality operations were built up successful America. And it got this escaped pass.

And ironically, each the questions astir ‘Did my concern successful that streaming app work?’ are raising questions astir however bash I cognize my broadcasting ads worked? I should astir apt measurement the outcomes of that, too. At the extremity of the day, it’s not different. It’s the aforesaid contented successful the aforesaid advertisement connected the aforesaid surface to the aforesaid household member. But linear outcomes person truly not been measured astatine the apical of the funnel. 

Q: And the applicable answer?

A: The applicable reply is it’s usually antithetic parties and antithetic agencies who are touching these things. So, arsenic you know, we’ve had integer agencies who worked connected our brands’ show and banner ads and online video buys for years. At the aforesaid time, we had the TV bureau that worked connected the linear buy. Sure it’s the aforesaid creative, but erstwhile it’s converted into a 30-second pre-roll, it gets sent to the integer agency. When it’s a 30-second spot connected broadcast, it gets sent to the TV bureau and that’s changing.

And past this large question arises of who owns the CTV budgets? It’s TV, but it’s digital, it’s both, truthful who owns it? In general, the TV radical person gotten much of that. But this is ending and determination aren’t going to beryllium integer agencies and TV agencies, they’ll conscionable beryllium media agencies who person to beryllium cross-channel. 

Q: You’ve enactment guardant a mentation that’s wide capable that I tin recognize it. But volition thing that wide and nonstop past a Hollywood negotiation? 

A: Yeah, I won’t assertion immoderate adept penetration into being successful the existent negotiating country and however the ineligible play volition play out. That portion we don’t know. We conscionable look astatine it from ‘team brand,’ arsenic we say. So we cognize that marque advertizing has paid for the movies, the TV shows we consume, the euphony we perceive to. And that’s wherefore this is ever connected our minds. 

Read Entire Article