Any customer information platform (CDP) indispensable nestle nicely into your martech stack, including your lawsuit information ecosystem. Like galore architectural choices, you look fewer implicit rights and wrongs here, but you person options worthy considering. 

At Real Story Group, we’ve seen 3 wide approaches, including variants of each:

• Licensing a CDP from your anchor martech suite.
• Deploying a best-of-breed CDP.
• Using components to physique requisite CDP functionality. (I explored the 3rd attack successful an earlier article, but I’ll grow further here.) 

Of course, these are not mutually exclusive. In immoderate cases, an endeavor volition privation to instrumentality a hybrid approach. Nevertheless, they supply a utile contrast, truthful let’s excavation deeper.

Approach 1: CDP from an anchor suite

Many suite vendors — SAP, Adobe, Oracle, Salesforce and Microsoft — merchantability wide selling suites supported (to varying degrees) by an optional CDP they fervently privation you to license. 

On the buyer’s side, I recognize the temptation. Why not effort to simplify the choice? Some consultants and analysts propulsion this approach, too.

Our probe suggests otherwise, and we person seen galore poor-fitting solutions based connected a casual CDP selection. Here are a fewer imaginable reasons.

• Recall that large martech vendors person mostly cobbled unneurotic their suites via acquisition. Thus, the genesis and improvement of their CDP offerings are foremost to integrate each those acquired products. 
• These vendors have successful immoderate cases a questionable way record of sustaining a affirmative narration with your martech team.
• These CDPs tend to stay comparatively immature.

There’s nary harm successful considering a suite vendor’s CDP add-on. But marque definite you prime it connected its merit and not due to the fact that it comes from an incumbent supplier. 

Dig deeper: Customer information level (CDP) buyer’s guide

Approach 2: Deploy a best-of-breed CDP

There are dozens of specialized CDPs successful the marketplace. CDPs tin supply a wide scope of functionality, and consequently, the marketplace is wide, fragmented, and characterized by galore antithetic approaches to diagnostic sets and architectures. 

So there’s a bully accidental you tin find the right-fit packaged solution, which is ever a boon. Do remember, though, that adjacent with a best-of-breed CDP, idiosyncratic volition apt person to execute a batch of development and integration work. 

---

---

Approach 3: Assemble components

Instead of utilizing a packaged CDP, you “compose” your CDP utilizing different components. Most enterprises already person immoderate benignant of data warehouse (DWH) and/or information lake. So alternatively of copying that information implicit from a DWH into a CDP, wherefore not usage your DWH arsenic your CDP?

Of course, a DWH is not a CDP, truthful this attack requires different components to physique a CDP-like layer. At the precise minimum, you’d request a reverse-ETL tool to propulsion information retired of your DWH and past propulsion it to activation channels.

But that’s not sufficient. You’d besides request components for different capabilities that a CDP provides: 

• Data ingestion.
• Identity resolution.
• Data prime management.
• Marketer-friendly segmentation.
• Triggers.
• Activation
• And, potentially, orchestration. 

Now, you whitethorn not request each these, truthful you tin prime and take to physique precisely what you need. Remember that, to immoderate degree, you are gathering bundle here. What’s absorbing for the developer whitethorn beryllium sub-optimal for the concern stakeholder.

Some proponents of this CDP-by-assembly person gone to the grade of claiming that CDPs are dormant and that this attack is each you need. I disagree. There is simply a clip and spot for each 3 approaches.

Composability arsenic a spectrum

By nature, modern martech stacks are “composable.” I judge that the 3 approaches supra truly correspond a spectrum of composability. As you determination from “suite bolt-ons” to “packaged best-of-breed” to “componentized” (and possibly adjacent beyond to complete DIY), the granularity of composability increases.

Initially, arsenic the granularity increases, you get much successful presumption of functionality and capabilities. But a further summation successful composability lone brings diminishing returns successful presumption of out-of-the-box functionality, albeit with a much purpose-built solution.

What are the trade-offs?

There is nary “one size fits all” successful this marketplace, and determination are ever trade-offs. 

Componentization allows you to physique a much purpose-built solution that whitethorn amended acceptable your existent needs portion perchance quicker to get started.

That said, arsenic your needs germinate oregon caller requirements are added, you volition apt request further components and put much clip and resources to physique thing that is astir apt disposable arsenic out-of-the-box successful a best-of-breed tool. Consequently, arsenic your requirements and components expand, the complexity of the stack volition besides increase. 

How should you decide?

The fig beneath provides a model for deciding which attack is much suitable for you. It describes assorted trade-offs and however each of these approaches tin interaction your stack complexity, acceptable to purpose, scope of functionality, full outgo of ownership and easiness of implementation. 

You tin spot each of the approaches has its pros and cons. A best-of-breed CDP provides enactment for a wide scope of usage cases and allows you to standard up to adhd enactment for further usage cases gradually. 

The “componentized” attack allows you to physique thing circumstantial to your existent requirement. It whitethorn beryllium casual to commencement with (“We tin get your information from Snowflake and nonstop it to your email level successful 5 minutes”). But arsenic your requirements go much sophisticated, you request much portion parts, making your stack adjacent much complex.

So again, determination are nary pat answers here.

---

Opinions expressed successful this nonfiction are those of the impermanent writer and not needfully MarTech. Staff authors are listed here.

---